Skip to content
Please allow 4–5 additional days for handling during the holiday season.
Please allow 4–5 additional days for handling during the holiday season.
3/25 insignia over image of 3/25 Marines in Iraq in late 2005

Matador: Breaking the Line at the Syrian Border

Introduction — A Border Ignited

The Edge of the Map

In May 2005, the western edge of Iraq—where the Euphrates River snakes along the Syrian border—erupted into some of the fiercest fighting the Marines had seen since the invasion. The town of al-Qaim, a vital smuggling corridor and insurgent sanctuary, had become a revolving door for foreign fighters and weapons flowing into Iraq. Intelligence reports spoke of training camps, fortified safe houses, and a growing enemy infrastructure too dangerous to ignore.

Coalition commanders decided it was time to cut it out at the root.

Map showing Al-Qa'im and its proximity to the Syrian border

Map showing Al-Qa'im and its proximity to the Syrian border

Not Just a Raid—A Combat Surge

Dubbed Operation Matador, the mission was far more than a lightning strike or hit-and-run raid. It was a multi-pronged, combined-arms sweep—part river crossing, part urban assault, part armor push—designed to disrupt enemy networks, eliminate fighters, and cripple insurgent logistics flowing in from Syria.

What followed was eleven days of combat, spanning riverbanks, farmlands, and fortified towns like Sadah, New Ubaydi, and Karabilah. From coordinated ambushes to IED traps, the insurgents were ready. But so were the Marines.

Who Went In — The Battle Group Assembles

The task force was a blend of active-duty and reserve Marines, engineers, armored support, and close air assets, drawn together to form a lethal strike package. Among them:

  • Task Force 3/2 – Spearheading the offensive with aggressive mechanized infantry.
  • Task Force 3/25 – Including the now-revered Lima Company, whose 1st Platoon would pay a devastating price.
  • 4th Assault Amphibian Battalion – Providing armored transport and river-crossing mobility.
  • 2nd Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion, Bravo Company – Scouting ahead and hitting fast.
  • Bravo Company, 4th Combat Engineer Battalion – Breaching the Euphrates’ banks under fire.
  • 814th Engineer Company (Multi-Role Bridge Company) – Building a floating bridge while rafting Marines and armor into the fight.
  • 2nd Platoon, Alpha Company, 1st Tank Battalion – With M1A1 Abrams tanks in direct fire support roles.
  • HMLA-269 (detachment) – Flying AH-1W Super Cobras and UH-1N Hueys for close air support and MEDEVAC.
  • 163rd Ordnance – Supporting with explosive ordnance disposal and rear-area logistics.

This wasn’t a conventional battalion-level mission. It was a combined-arms brawl—a synchronized assault deep into contested territory, where every squad, every vehicle, and every airframe had a role to play.

During Operation Matador in May 2005, Marines demolished a house in New Ubaydi, Iraq, that hid a large weapons cache. Several nearby caches had been moved there, and the Marines used about 20 pounds of C4 to blow the house.

During Operation Matador in May 2005, Marines demolished a house in New Ubaydi, Iraq, that hid a large weapons cache.

Building the Strike Force — Task Force 3/2 and 3/25 Unite

Two Battalions, One Mission

In early May 2005, two Marine battalions—one active-duty, one reserve—were fused into a single combat force with a clear, aggressive objective:
clear the al-Qaim region of insurgents, hold key terrain, and disrupt the foreign fighter pipeline bleeding across the Syrian border.

On paper, the battalions came from different worlds. In the Euphrates River Valley, they’d fight as one.

Task Force 3/2 — The Spear from Camp Lejeune

3rd Battalion, 2nd Marines (3/2) came from the 2nd Marine Division, based out of Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. These were seasoned, active-duty infantry Marines—trained in mechanized maneuver, amphibious assault, and rapid urban response. Known for their mobility and aggression, 3/2 had already been pushing westward from Rawah and Hit, fighting their way along the Euphrates and clearing enemy pockets town by town.

As the vanguard for Operation Matador, TF 3/2 would kick in the doors—breach the riverbanks, seize crossings, and hit first.

3/2 Marines provide security in an urban area during Operation Matador

3/2 Marines provide security in an urban area during Operation Matador

Task Force 3/25 — Citizen Warriors from the Heartland

3rd Battalion, 25th Marines (3/25) was a Marine Forces Reserve battalion, drawn largely from Ohio and surrounding states. Though not full-time Marines, they were no less disciplined or lethal. Trained to the same standard as active-duty units, the reservists of 3/25 brought grit, cohesion, and a deep sense of duty that would soon be tested under fire.

Attached to Regimental Combat Team 2 (RCT-2), TF 3/25 added strength, manpower, and mechanized punch to the assault. Their mission: secure urban zones, hold cleared ground, and back up TF 3/2 as the operation pushed deeper into insurgent-held territory.

Task Force Fusion — Firepower, Engineers, and Tanks

Together, the two battalions formed the bulk of the offensive line. But they weren’t alone.

To strengthen the assault, Operation Matador’s planners integrated a powerful set of attachments into the strike force. The 4th Assault Amphibian Battalion brought in AAVs to handle river crossings and troop mobility, while Bravo Company, 4th Combat Engineer Battalion was tasked with breaching riverbanks and clearing enemy obstacles. They were joined by the 814th Engineer Company (MRBC)—Army engineers trained to deploy floating bridges under combat conditions—ensuring mobility across the Euphrates. Armor support came from 2nd Platoon, Alpha Company, 1st Tank Battalion, fielding Abrams tanks to anchor the assault and break hardened resistance. Overhead, HMLA-269 provided close air support with AH-1W Cobras and utility lift with UH-1Ns. Finally, sustainment and explosive ordnance disposal were handled by the 163rd Ordnance Detachment, keeping the task force supplied, mobile, and lethal.

The result was a self-contained strike package: infantry, armor, engineers, air, and logistics—all geared for one thing: offensive combat.

Marines from 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines moved down a hill toward houses to be searched during a cordon and knock on May 10, 2005, as part of Operation Matador

Marines from 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines moved down a hill toward houses to be searched during a cordon and knock on May 10, 2005

The Objective — Disrupt the Ratlines

The goal was not just to clear towns like Sadah and Karabilah, but to strike deep into the insurgents’ logistics lifeline—a corridor of safe houses, weapons caches, and foreign fighter ratlines funneling from Syria into Iraq.

For months, insurgents had used the region as a rest-and-refit zone—training fresh recruits, assembling car bombs, and launching attacks deeper into Anbar. The Marines' job was simple in theory, brutal in practice:
Kick in the doors, clear the safe houses, and kill or capture whoever ran them.

Matador would be no holding pattern, no patrol-heavy slog. This was an offensive—a thunder run across the sand, smoke, and riverbeds of the Syrian frontier.

Steel and Riverbanks — Engineers and Amphibians Breach the Borderlands

In the opening phase of Operation Matador, Task Force 3/2 faced a daunting obstacle: crossing the Euphrates River into an entrenched insurgent sanctuary near the Syrian border. What followed was a synchronized display of engineering under fire, amphibious warfare, and raw combat grit.

U.S. Army engineers used a floating ribbon bridge ferry to transport Marines from 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, and their armored HMMWVs across the Euphrates during Operation Matador.

U.S. Army engineers used a floating ribbon bridge ferry to transport Marines from 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, and their armored HMMWVs across the Euphrates during Operation Matador

Breach Teams Up Front — 4th Combat Engineer Battalion

Breaking the Riverbanks — Bravo Company, 4th CEB

The first punch came from Bravo Company, 4th Combat Engineer Battalion, whose Marines were tasked with breaking through the riverbanks. Under the threat of direct fire and booby-traps, they used heavy equipment and demolitions to carve out mobility corridors for the assault force. Their work was deliberate and dangerous—exposing themselves to enemy fire while clearing obstacles that blocked armored vehicles and infantry from advancing.

Bridging the Gap — 814th Engineer Company (MRB)

Once the banks were breached, 814th Engineer Company (Multi-Role Bridge Company) rolled in. Trained for combat bridging operations, these U.S. Army engineers assembled and launched a floating bridge across the Euphrates while under sporadic enemy fire. This was no rear-area task—it was a frontline engineering assault. Working in fast current, often at night, they pieced together a bridge wide and strong enough to carry AAVs, tanks, and resupply trucks into the fight.

Regimental Combat Team 2 received heavy fire from Ubaydi during Operation Matador. With air support throughout, U.S. forces killed about 60 insurgents in the fight.

Regimental Combat Team 2 received heavy fire from Ubaydi during Operation Matador. With air support throughout, U.S. forces killed about 60 insurgents in the fight.

Amphibious Advance — 4th Assault Amphibian Battalion

With the bridge secured, 4th Assault Amphibian Battalion surged forward. Their AAVs plowed through water and into hostile terrain, bringing squads of Marines into the battle. These armored behemoths weren’t just transport—they carried firepower in the form of .50 caliber machine guns and 40mm grenade launchers, supporting troops as they pushed deeper into insurgent-held villages. The AAVs helped absorb ambushes, suppress enemy positions, and serve as rolling bunkers in open terrain.

Assault Coordination Under Fire

The sequence required perfect coordination: engineers breaching under fire, bridging teams deploying hardware in real time, and amphibious units advancing behind them. All of this took place under hostile observation, in rough terrain, with limited time and no room for error. Every meter gained along the river was earned with sweat, steel, and small-arms fire.

LCpl Williams, radio operator with 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines, Lima Co., carries the radio for Capt. Toland, 3rd Platoon commander, May 10, 2005, during Operation Matador

LCpl Williams, radio operator with 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines, Lima Co., carries the radio for Capt. Toland, 3rd Platoon commander, May 10, 2005, during Operation Matador

Into the Fight — 2nd LAR Bravo Company and Alpha 1/1 Tanks Lead the Assault

Spearheading the Advance: 2nd LAR Bravo Company

Bravo Company of the 2nd Light Armored Reconnaissance (LAR) Battalion took point in the inland assault, capitalizing on their vehicles’ speed and agility to move rapidly into contested areas. Their mission was to penetrate enemy lines, gather intelligence, and engage hostile forces before heavier units arrived.

Armored Support on the Flanks: 2nd Platoon, Alpha Company, 1st Tank Battalion

Flanking Bravo Company was 2nd Platoon, Alpha Company, 1st Tank Battalion, fielding M1A1 Abrams tanks. These armored giants provided the critical firepower and protection necessary to counter entrenched enemy positions and reinforce the lighter LAR vehicles during engagements.

Marines from 3/2 provide security and secure the urban area of Al Ubaydi during Operation Matador

Marines from 3/2 provide security and secure the urban area of Al Ubaydi during Operation Matador

Route and Tactical Coordination

The assault followed a predetermined route designed to optimize speed while minimizing exposure. The LAR vehicles moved ahead to scout and screen, leveraging their reconnaissance capabilities to detect enemy presence and relay real-time intel. This information allowed the tank platoon to position themselves effectively for rapid response.

Engaging the Enemy: Combining Speed and Armor

When enemy contact occurred, the LAR scouts quickly identified threats and called in supporting fires from the M1A1 tanks. The tanks’ heavy armament suppressed hostile forces, while the LAR maintained mobility to outmaneuver the opposition. This combination of swift reconnaissance and overwhelming armored firepower enabled the assault to maintain momentum and overcome resistance efficiently.

A USMC M1A2 Abrams tank from 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment holds security on the streets of Al Ubaydi during Operation Matador. The operation aims to disrupt Syrian entry points for insurgents and support security in Al Anbar province.

A USMC M1A2 Abrams tank from 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment holds security on the streets of Al Ubaydi during Operation Matador. The operation aims to disrupt Syrian entry points for insurgents and support security in Al Anbar province.

Overhead Guardians — HMLA-269’s H-1s Take the Fight to the Sky

AH-1W SuperCobras and UH-1Ns Provide Crucial Support

Marine Light Attack Helicopter Squadron 269 (HMLA-269) deployed a mix of AH-1W SuperCobras and UH-1N Hueys to support the ground assault. These versatile aircraft offered close air support, route clearance, and medevac capabilities, acting as a vital lifeline for troops engaged in hostile territory.

Delivering Close Air Support

The AH-1W SuperCobras took on a pivotal role, delivering precise, rapid-fire attacks against insurgent positions threatening the advancing forces. On one notable strike, HMLA-269 pilots engaged a fortified enemy stronghold firing heavy machine guns and RPGs, using a combination of 20mm cannon bursts and guided rockets to suppress the threat and allow ground forces to advance safely.

HMLA-269 participating in Operation Spear the following month after participating in Operation Matador

HMLA-269 participating in Operation Spear the following month after participating in Operation Matador

Clearing the Route and Medevac Operations

UH-1N Hueys patrolled the assault route, spotting IEDs and other hazards while providing aerial overwatch. Their presence deterred ambushes and ensured the convoy maintained momentum. When casualties occurred, these helicopters performed swift medical evacuations, quickly extracting wounded Marines under fire and transporting them to forward aid stations—saving countless lives.

Lima Company’s Ordeal — The AAV Hit

The Moment of Impact

1st Platoon, Lima Company, 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines, was moving cautiously through contested terrain when their Assault Amphibious Vehicle (AAV) struck an improvised explosive device (IED) hidden along the route. The blast was sudden and devastating—obliterating the vehicle’s front and immediately throwing the platoon into chaos.

1st Platoon, Lima Company, 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines' destroyed Light Armored Reconnaissance (LAR) vehicle after striking an IED during Operation Matador (Fox)

Bravery in the Face of Devastation

Inside the crippled AAV, Marines faced a harrowing fight for survival. Despite the shock and injuries, they fought to aid their wounded comrades and maintain unit cohesion. The platoon leader quickly coordinated a defense perimeter, calling for immediate medical evacuation and suppressive fire from nearby elements to prevent further enemy attacks.

The Human Cost

The blast resulted in complete casualties aboard the AAV—every Marine inside was either killed or wounded. The loss was deeply felt across the battalion. Friends, brothers-in-arms, and leaders had been struck down in an instant, underscoring the brutal reality of insurgent tactics and the enormous sacrifice borne by these young Marines.

LCpl Travis Williams is the only one in this image who survived the explosion—he switched tracks just before the company moved toward Barwanna. Two of the three AAV crew were killed in the blast. The driver was shot out of his hatch and seriously wounded, and the platoon’s interpreter also died

LCpl Travis Williams is the only one in this image who survived the explosion—he switched tracks just before the company moved toward Barwanna. Two of the three AAV crew were killed in the blast. The driver was shot out of his hatch and seriously wounded, and the platoon’s interpreter also died

Sacrifice That Anchors the Mission

This tragic moment stands as the emotional core of Operation Matador’s story. It reminds us that behind every maneuver and strategic advance are individuals who faced mortal danger with courage and resilience. Their sacrifice propelled the mission forward, inspiring their fellow Marines to push harder in the face of relentless threats.

A Multi-Angle Fight — 163rd Ordnance and the Wider Battle

EOD and Logistics Under Fire: The 163rd Ordnance Battalion

Operating in one of the most IED-saturated zones of Operation Matador, the 163rd Ordnance Battalion played a critical role in keeping the fight moving forward. Their Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) teams were tasked with locating and neutralizing a relentless stream of roadside bombs, booby traps, and hidden explosives designed to halt the Marine advance.

The hazardous conditions demanded constant vigilance, as every street and alleyway could conceal deadly threats. The 163rd’s efforts ensured supply lines remained open, allowing armored vehicles, infantry, and support elements to maneuver through dangerous terrain without falling victim to insurgent devices.

LCpl Barnard, a combat engineer with 3/25, preps charges to breach secured doors during Operation Matador—part of efforts to disrupt Syrian insurgent routes in Al Anbar

LCpl Barnard, a combat engineer with 3/25, preps charges to breach secured doors during Operation Matador—part of efforts to disrupt Syrian insurgent routes in Al Anbar

House-to-House Combat Across Multiple Towns

While EOD teams cleared the way, Marine units engaged in intense urban combat in the towns of Sadah, New Ubaydi, and Karabilah. These battles involved close-quarters fighting against an entrenched enemy skilled in utilizing the urban environment to their advantage.

Marines encountered booby-trapped homes rigged with explosives, improvised bunkers concealed in civilian structures, and sniper nests that demanded cautious, methodical clearing operations. The close-combat nature of these engagements tested the resolve and training of the troops, often forcing them into brutal, room-by-room fights to secure each block.

The Scale and Complexity of the Fight

The sheer volume of IEDs and fortifications highlighted the insurgents’ determination to defend their strongholds at all costs. According to after-action reports, the 163rd Ordnance teams neutralized dozens of explosive devices daily, while infantry units pushed through fortified resistance in multiple locations simultaneously.

This multi-angle battle required tight coordination between EOD, infantry, armor, and aviation units to maintain momentum and minimize casualties. The combined efforts underscored the complexity of modern urban warfare and the adaptability demanded of U.S. forces.

En route to Al Ubaydi, a 3/2 HMMWV displays an American flag during Operation Matador—part of efforts to disrupt Syrian insurgent routes in Al Anba

En route to Al Ubaydi, a 3/2 HMMWV displays an American flag during Operation Matador—part of efforts to disrupt Syrian insurgent routes in Al Anba

Aftermath — 11 Days of Combat, 49 Casualties

The Human Toll

Operation Matador exacted a heavy price. Over the course of eleven relentless days, U.S. forces sustained 49 casualties—9 killed in action and 40 wounded. Each loss weighed heavily on the units, underscoring the brutal cost of taking and holding contested ground against a determined insurgency.

Tactical Gains Achieved

Despite the hardships, the operation achieved critical objectives. Marines destroyed numerous safe houses and enemy caches, severing vital nodes in insurgent networks. Significant numbers of foreign fighters were killed, disrupting the enemy’s command and control structures. Additionally, key smuggling routes used to funnel weapons and supplies were dismantled, delivering a strategic blow to insurgent operations in the region.

Marines from 3/25 escort a homeowner to open doors during a search of his property in Operation Matador—part of efforts to disrupt insurgent routes near the Syrian border in Al Anbar

Marines from 3/25 escort a homeowner to open doors during a search of his property in Operation Matador—part of efforts to disrupt insurgent routes near the Syrian border in Al Anbar

The Cost Beyond the Battlefield

Yet, the aftermath also revealed deeper, less tangible losses. The operation shattered any illusions of calm in the area—“quiet” sectors proved to be fraught with danger, eroding trust among locals and soldiers alike. Innocence was lost in the harsh realities of urban counterinsurgency warfare, where every street corner could hide a threat, and every alliance was fragile.

Legacy — The Echoes of Matador

Tactical Victory Amid Strategic Uncertainty

Operation Matador stands as a testament to the Marines’ ability to conduct rapid, aggressive assaults deep into hostile territory. While the operation did not fully seal the porous Syrian border—allowing insurgent infiltration to continue—it demonstrated the power of joint force coordination, combining armor, infantry, aviation, and specialized units into a cohesive, effective fighting force.

The mission proved that with speed, precision, and determination, Marines could disrupt enemy operations and challenge insurgent sanctuaries—sending a clear message that no area was beyond reach.

Lima Company preparing to head outside the wire (Fox)

Honoring the Fallen — A Tribute to Lima Company

As we reflect on Matador’s legacy, it is impossible to forget the sacrifice of those who paid the ultimate price. Lima Company’s ordeal remains the emotional heart of the operation, embodying the courage and resilience of every Marine who faced danger head-on.

Previous article Operation Spear: The Fierce Fight in Karabilah, June 2005
Next article Holding the Line: The 2005 Battle of Abu Ghraib

Leave a comment

* Required fields

About the Author

Holden Willmore Historian and USMC Veteran

Holden Willmore

Holden is a Marine Corps veteran and high school history teacher with a deep passion for military history. He served as a Sergeant in the U.S. Marine Corps, with assignments in Okinawa and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point. After completing his service, Holden earned a bachelor's degree in History and a master's in Social Studies Education from the University of Minnesota.

Compare products

{"one"=>"Select 2 or 3 items to compare", "other"=>"{{ count }} of 3 items selected"}

Select first item to compare

Select second item to compare

Select third item to compare

Compare
5
reviews
See all reviews